Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ; (6): 177-181, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-936131

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm is one of the most challenging aortic diseases. Open surgical repair remains constrained with considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The emergence of a hybrid approach utilizing visceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm repair has brought an alternative for high-risk patients. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between hybrid and open repairs in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.@*METHODS@#In this retrospectively observational study, patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treated in a single center between January 2008 and December 2019 were reviewed, of whom 11 patients with hybrid repair, and 18 patients with open repair were identified. Demographic characteristic, operative data, perioperative morbidity and mortality, freedom from reintervention, and long-term survival were compared between the two groups.@*RESULTS@#In the hybrid repair group, the patients with dissection aneurysm, preoperative combined renal insufficiency, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 or more were significantly overwhelming than in the open repair group. The operation time of debranching hybrid repair was (445±85) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (955±599) mL. There were 2 cases of complications in the early 30 days after surgery, without paraplegia, and 1 case died. The 30-day complication rate was 18.2%, and the 30-day mortality was 9.1%. The operation time of the patients with open repair was (560±245) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (6 100±4 536) mL. Twelve patients had complications in the early 30 days after surgery, including 1 paraplegia and 4 deaths within 30 days. The 30-day complication rate was 66.7%, and the 30-day mortality was 22.2%. The bleeding volume in hybrid repair was significantly reduced compared with open repair (P < 0.001). Besides, the incidence of 30-day complications in hybrid surgery was significantly reduced (P=0.011). During the follow-up period, there were 4 reinterventions and 3 deaths in hybrid repair group. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause survival rates were 72%, 54%, and 29%, respectively. In open repair group, reintervention was performed in 1 case and 5 cases died, and the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause survival rates were 81%, 71%, and 35%, respectively. There was no significant difference between hybrid repair and open repair in all-cause survival and aneurysm-specific survival.@*CONCLUSION@#Hybrid approach utilizing visceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm repair is a safe and effective surgical method for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The incidence of early postoperative complications and mortality is significantly reduced compared with traditional surgery, but the efficacy in the medium and long term still needs to be improved.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ; (6): 362-364, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-941822

ABSTRACT

Peripheral arterial disease is one part of systematic atherosclerosis, becoming a heavy burden of human health. Patients in end stage of peripheral arterial disease manifest critical limb ischemia with severe rest pain and refractory ulcer. Surgical revascularization is the optimal option for patients with critical limb ischemia to avoid major amputation and improve quality of life. However, some of them contraindicate surgical revascularizations owing to coexisting morbidities. Spinal cord stimulation is reported to be effective and minimally invasive in pain relief and limb salvage for patients with limb ischemia. Here, we reported one case with chronic critical limb ischemia and gangrene of foot who underwent spinal cord stimulation, which was, as we knew, the first case in China. He was diagnosed with Burger disease and accompanied with history of stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Castleman's disease. It showed totally occlusive lesions of external iliac and femoropopliteal artery and no outflows below the knee in the computed tomography angiography. Given the complexity of lesions and weakness of the patient, spinal cord stimulation was indicated for control of rest pain and limb salvage. As specified, we implanted the temporary neurostimulator as the first step. After 2 weeks from temporary neurostimulator implantation, the patient achieved significant relief in intensity of pain, and acquired 20% improvement of transcutaneous oxygen pressure. The satisfactory results indicated probable effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation, thus we performed the permanent neurostimulator implantation 1 month later. During 2 months of follow-up, the patients stabilized at Fountain III with pain relief with one kind of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. In our case, we confirmed the significant validity of spinal cord stimulation for pain control and consequent improvement of quality of life in non-reconstructable chronic critical limb ischemia. Furthermore, we reviewed that a number of published studies suggested that spinal cord stimulation be a reasonable option for patients with critical rest pain, especially who contraindicated surgical revascularization. The application of spinal cord stimulation in pain relief for non-reconstructable chronic critical limb ischemia was approved by related guidelines released by European Society of Cardiology and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus. Further investigations are required for assessing the long-term outcome in limb salvage.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , China , Ischemia , Leg , Limb Salvage , Quality of Life , Spinal Cord , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Treatment Outcome
3.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 981-984, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-360737

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To summarize the experience in management of prosthetic graft infection (PGI) after lower limb arterial bypasses and investigate optimal measures for prevention and treatment.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Records of 15 cases of PGI between January 2004 and December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed, including 14 male and 1 female with the average age of 64.8 years (ranged from 40 to 84 years). PGI occurred from 5 d to 59 months (average 6.4 months) after the last reconstructive procedures with symptoms as follow: nonhealing wound with vascular graft exposure in 8 cases, persistent sinus related to vascular graft with purulent secretion in 5 cases and without secretion in 1 case, and ill-incorporated graft with peri-graft fluid in 1 case. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were administrated in all PGI cases. Surgical treatments included local debridement and drainage in 4 cases (one death from postoperative acute myocardial infarction), local debridement and skin flap rotation in one case, complete removal of the occluded infected grafts in 8 cases including major amputation in 3 cases, removal of patent infected graft and extra-anatomic bypass with silver-bonded Dacron vascular graft in 1 case, and partial removal of patent infected graft without reconstruction in 1 case with a re-canalized stent-graft.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Limb salvage was achieved in 9 cases, and 4 cases received major amputation. One case was failed to follow-up and one died of postoperative acute myocardial infarction. Initially 13 patients were followed and 2 died during follow-up (because of colon carcinoma and intracranial hemorrhage respectively). Eleven patients were followed for 1 to 70 months (average 22.3 months) including 8 cases with limb salvage and 3 with major amputation. Accumulative mortality rate, amputation rate, and graft occlusion rate were 20% (3/15), 26.7% (4/15), and 53.3% (8/15) respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>PGI after lower limb arterial bypasses is a devastating complication with high risk of graft occlusion and amputation. Removal of the infected grafts may be mandatory for most cases, but local management for patent infected grafts may be recommendable for selected cases.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Follow-Up Studies , Lower Extremity , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Diagnosis , Therapeutics , Retrospective Studies
4.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 19-21, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-254837

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the feasibility of one-stage replacement of total aorta for patient with renal failure.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The patient was male, 43 years old. The type I aortic dissection was secondary to type III aortic dissection 4 months after endovascular treatment of descending aorta using stented graft 1 year ago. All important branches from aorta were irrigated by false lumen of dissection except left renal artery. The patient has been dialyzed because of renal failure before 5 months with low platelets. Single-stage replacement of total aorta from ascending aorta to iliac artery was successful under deep hypothermia and cardiopulmonary bypass. The operation lasted 12 h. Blood loss during operation was 9000 ml and infusion of blood and blood plasma 7300 ml (including 1500 ml of blood retrieval) and blood platelet 800 ml.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Autonomic activity of four limbs was recovered 2 d after operation, and mind recovered 4 d after surgery. The intubation of trachea was extracted 1 week after operation. Re-check through CT showed all vascular prostheses and reconstructed visceral arteries and intercostal arteries were patent though no recovery of renal function.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>One-stage replacement of total aorta for patient with renal failure is feasible.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Aortic Dissection , General Surgery , Aorta , General Surgery , Aortic Aneurysm , General Surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Feasibility Studies , Renal Insufficiency
5.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 1188-1191, 2007.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-340833

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the use and efficacy of balloon dilation in arteriosclerotic stenosis or occlusions of femoropopliteal arteries.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Thirty patients (27 men, 3 women, age from 44 to 78 years, mean 70) with arteriosclerotic stenosis or occlusion of femoropopliteal arteries received balloon dilation. Thirty-one balloons, which included 3 common balloons, 16 cutting balloons, 10 "deep" balloons and 2 small balloons, were used. Follow-up surveillance featured periodic physical examination and duplex scanning.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In all 30 patients, the technique success was reached only with 6 minor dissections. Angiography after dilation showed that the treated vessels were all patent with a < 20% stenosis remaining in any given lesions. After treatment and over a follow-up of 1 to 17 months (mean 6 months), the symptoms were relieved and all treated vessels were patent except 1 patient (3.3%) who had a gangrene foot and received limb amputation.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Balloon dilation has a comparative ratio of one-stage success and short-term patency. Some special balloons seem to have a promising future in the management of femoropopliteal arterial arteriosclerotic lesions.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon , Arterial Occlusive Diseases , Therapeutics , Arteriosclerosis Obliterans , Therapeutics , Femoral Artery , Follow-Up Studies , Lower Extremity , Popliteal Artery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL